top of page
lab group photo_edited.jpg

Research

Treatment of Lymphedema

Home

Kim C, Ali H, Tsai LL, Bulman J, Singhal D, Carroll B, Ahmed M, Weinstein J.


Abstract

Purpose: There are limited existing data on the lymphatic anatomy of patients with primary lymphedema (LED), which is caused by aberrant development of lymphatic channels. In addition, there is a paucity of contemporary studies that use groin intranodal lymphangiography (IL) to evaluate LED anatomy. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to better delineate the disease process and anatomy of primary LED using groin IL.
 
Materials and methods: We identified common groin IL findings in a cohort of 17 primary LED patients performed between 1/1/2017 and 1/31/2022 at a single institution. These patients were clinically determined to have primary lymphedema and demonstrated associated findings on lower extremity MR and lymphoscintigraphy.
 
Results: Ten patients (59%) demonstrated irregular lymph node morphology or a paucity of lymph nodes on the more symptomatic laterality. Eight patients (47%) demonstrated lymphovenous shunting from pre-existing anastomoses between the lymphatic and venous systems. Eight patients (47%) demonstrated passage of contrast past midline to the contralateral lymphatics. Finally, 12 patients (71%) failed to opacify the cisterna chyli and thoracic duct on their initial lymphangiograms. Delayed computed tomography of 3 patients showed eventual central lymphatic opacification up to the renal veins, but none of these patients showed central lymphatic opacification to the thorax.
 
Conclusion: This descriptive, exploratory study demonstrates common central groin IL findings in primary LED to highlight patterns interventional radiologists should identify and report when addressing primary LED.

Link to PDF

DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03605-9    

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37985479/

Friedman R, Johnson AR, Shillue K, Fleishman A, Mistretta C, Magrini L, Tran BNN, Rockson SG, Lu W, Yeh GY, Singhal D.


Abstract

Background: Methods of conservative management for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) are burdensome in terms of time, cost, and convenience. In addition, many patients are not candidates for surgical treatment. Preliminary results have demonstrated possible beneficial effects of acupuncture for patients with BCRL. In this small pilot study, we examined the safety and feasibility of an acupuncture randomized control trial (RCT) in this patient cohort, utilizing a battery of standardized clinical and patient-centered outcome measures.

Methods and Results: Patients with BCRL were randomized 2:1 to the acupuncture (n = 10) or the control (n = 4) group. Patients received acupuncture to the unaffected extremity biweekly for 6 weeks. Feasibility was defined as enrollment ≥80%, completion of ≥9 of 12 acupuncture sessions per person, and ≥75% completion of three of three measurement visits. To inform a future adequately powered RCT, we describe within-group changes in patient-centered outcomes, including circumferential measurements, bioimpedance spectroscopy, perometry, cytokine levels, and patient quality of life. Adverse events were systematically tracked. Fourteen patients completed the study. Of those who received acupuncture (n = 10), 8 completed all 12 acupuncture sessions, and 2 patients completed 11 sessions. Ninety-three percent of all participants completed all three measurement visits. There was no consistent improvement in arm volumes. Inflammatory marker levels had inconclusive fluctuations among both groups. All patients receiving acupuncture demonstrated an improvement in their functional quality-of-life score. No severe adverse events occurred.

Conclusions: A randomized controlled study of acupuncture for BCRL is feasible. The acupuncture intervention is acceptable in this population, without safety concerns in a small sample and warrants further investigation.

DOI: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0001      

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37083501/

Friedman R, Ismail Aly ME, Singhal D.


Abstract


No abstract available. 

Link to PDF

DOI: 10.1002/micr.31077         

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37339916/

Johnson AR, Otenti D, Bates KD, Repicci W, Dallow K, Deterling W, Lee BT, Singhal D.


Abstract

This article describes the key stakeholders and process involved in developing an insurance policy in the United States to establish medical necessity criteria for lymphatic surgery procedures. Lymphedema is a chronic health issue that impacts over 1.2 million patients and is associated with lifelong health, economic, and psychosocial costs.

Patients affected have been described as "medical nomads," as they often interface with multiple providers before receiving an accurate diagnosis and treatment. This underscores the lack of attention and understanding about this disease across all sectors of the medical system. Unlike nations including Sweden and the United Kingdom, which provide insurance coverage for treatment, the United States has lagged behind. As a country, we have neglected to fully recognize the consequences of inadequate treatment of lymphedema, including chronic morbidities such as loss of mobility, psychosocial sequelae, recurrent infections, and even death.

Recently, the authors' lymphatic center had the unique opportunity to help develop a policy that merged their clinical experience, recently established lymphatic care center of excellence criteria, and third-party payer policy expertise. This experience spanned 1 year from June of 2018 to June of 2019. The authors identify how key partnerships helped fill evidentiary gaps that ultimately resulted in policy change.

Link to PDF

DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010239        

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36727781/

Bustos VP, Friedman R, Pardo JA, Granoff M, Fu MR, Singhal D.


Abstract
 
Purpose: Lymphedema negatively impacts patients from a psychosocial standpoint and consequently affects patient's quality of life. Debulking procedures using power-assisted liposuction (PAL) are currently deemed an effective treatment for fat-dominant lymphedema and improves anthropometric measurements as well as quality of life. However, there have been no studies specifically evaluating changes in symptoms related to lymphedema after PAL. An understanding of how symptoms change after this procedure would be valuable for preoperative counseling and to guide patient expectations.
 
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients with extremity lymphedema who underwent PAL from January 2018 to December 2020 at a tertiary care facility. A retrospective chart review and follow-up phone survey were conducted to compare signs and symptoms related to lymphedema before and after PAL.
 
Results: Forty-five patients were included in this study. Of these, 27 patients (60%) underwent upper extremity PAL and 18 patients (40%) underwent lower extremity PAL. The mean follow-up time was 15.5±7.9 months. After PAL, patients with upper extremity lymphedema reported having resolved heaviness (44%), as well as improved achiness (79%) and swelling (78%). In patients with lower extremity lymphedema, they reported having improved all signs and symptoms, particularly swelling (78%), tightness (72%), and achiness (71%).
 
Conclusions: In patients with fat-dominant lymphedema, PAL positively impacts patient-reported outcomes in a sustained fashion over time. Continuous surveillance of postoperative studies is required to elucidate factors independently associated with the outcomes found in our study. Moreover, further studies using a mixed method approach will help us better understand patient's expectations to achieve informed decision and adequate treatment goals.

Link to PDF

DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003430     

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36881732/


Abstract

Breast lymphedema is a type of breast cancer related lymphedema that leads to significant discomfort and negative impact on body image. Conservative therapy and lymphovenous bypass have been previously described as possible treatment methods for breast lymphedema, however, a unified approach to treatment is lacking. The current report describes a case of breast lymphedema successfully treated with vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) after failed attempt at management with conservative therapy.
 
The patient is a 48-year-old female with right-sided breast cancer who underwent breast conservation therapy in 2015 and subsequently developed pain and swelling of the right breast. The diagnosis of breast lymphedema was supported by clinical evaluation as well as MRI, lymphoscintigraphy, and lymphography. In consultation with a breast surgeon, breast lymphedema was determined not to be an indication for mastectomy. The patient was offered and underwent an omental VLNT to the right breast. A 20 cm segment of omentum with associated gastroepiploic vessels and lymph nodes was harvested, transferred to the right axilla and gastroepiploic vessels were anastomosed to the recipient thoracodorsal vessels. The patient tolerated the procedure well and there were no complications. Additional donor sites were considered, such as the groin and submental regions, but an omental flap was favored in this case because of the lower risk of donor site lymphedema. In the years following, the patient reported significant improvement in symptoms as well as objective reduction of edema on MRI. We propose the consideration of VLNT for breast lymphedema refractory to other methods of management.

Link to PDF

DOI: 10.1002/micr.31004.      

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36645346/


Kim G, Adondakis M, Smith MP, Singhal D, Tsai LL.

 

Rate of Incidental Edema in the Contralateral Arm of Patients with Unilateral Postsurgical Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema

Abstract
 

Background: Secondary upper extremity lymphedema occurs after an insult such as surgery. One theory suggests underlying lymphatic dysfunction predisposing certain patients into developing secondary lymphedema. We aim to determine the rate of incidental edema in the contralateral upper extremity of patients with secondary unilateral lymphedema. 

Methods and Results: MRI of the upper extremities were obtained in patients with lymphedema who were referred by a lymphedema clinic from 2017 to 2019. Axial short-tau inversion recovery MR images of the symptomatic and contralateral arms were retrospectively reviewed and edema severity was graded. Interobserver agreement was calculated. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was compared against MRI stage in symptomatic and contralateral. Age, symptom duration, body mass index (BMI), and history of chemotherapy were compared between patients with and without contralateral limb lymphedema. ICG severity was compared against MRI stage. Seventy-eight patients were analyzed. The MRI stages of symptomatic versus contralateral arms were 1.7 ± 1.1 versus 0.1 ± 0.4 (p < 0.00001). Interobserver agreement was 0.86 (0.79-0.94). Of the patients with MRI Stage 1 or above in the symptomatic arm (n = 64), 55 (82.1%) patients demonstrated no abnormality in the contralateral arm. Nine patients (14.1%) demonstrated asymptomatic edema (MRI Stage 1). The mean ICG lymphography stage of symptomatic versus contralateral arms was 1.83 ± 0.96 versus 0.04 ± 0.25 (p < 0.00001). There was no difference in the age, symptom duration, BMI, or history of chemotherapy between patients with or without edema in the contralateral arm. 

Conclusion: Asymptomatic contralateral edema was detected in 14.1% of patients with unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema using MRI modality.

DOI:  10.1089/lrb.2021.0022

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35914097/


Bloom, Joshua A. MD; Granoff, Melisa D. BA; Karlsson, Tobias MD; Greene, Arin K. MD, MMSc; Brorson, Håkan, MD, PhD; Chatterjee, Abhishek, MD, MBA; Singhal, Dhruv MD
 

 Power-assisted Liposuction for Lymphedema: A Cost-utility Analysis

Background: Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that has been described as the largest breast cancer survivorship burden. Debulking surgery has been shown to improve extremity volume, improve patient quality of life, and decrease the incidence of cellulitis in the literature. This procedure is routinely covered in numerous other developed countries, yet it is still inconsistently covered in the United States.

Methods: Extremity volumes from all patients who underwent debulking surgery of the upper extremity at two institutions between December 2017 and January 2020 with at least 12 months follow-up were included. Procedural costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement data. Average utility scores were obtained for each health state using a visual analog scale, then converted to quality-adjusted life years. A decision tree was generated, and incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate our findings.

Results: Debulking surgery is associated with a higher clinical effectiveness (quality-adjusted life year) of 27.05 compared to conservative management (23.34), with a relative cost reduction of $74,487. Rollback analysis favored debulking surgery as the cost-effective option compared to conservative management. The resulting 
negative incremental cost-utility ratio of −20,115.07 favored debulking surgery and indicated a dominant strategy.

Conclusion: Our study supports the use of debulking surgery for the treatment of chronic 
lymphedema of the upper extremity. (Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4671; doi: 
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671; Published online 18 November 2022.)

Abstract

Link to PDF

DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004671  

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36415620/

Lee, Broderick S.; Granoff, Melisa D. B.A.; Pardo, Jaime M.D.; Sun, Wei B.A.; Critchlow, Jonathan F. M.D.; Tsai, Leo M.D., Ph.D.; Upton, Joseph III M.D.; Singhal, Dhruv M.D.


Abstract


Vascularized lymph node transplantation is a surgical approach for the treatment of chronic lymphedema. However, there is no clinical standard for flap placement nor vascular anastomoses. The authors propose a novel flowthrough configuration for an omental vascularized lymph node transplant in the popliteal space. To prepare the popliteal space for an omental free flap, the medial popliteal fat pad and medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle were debulked. Venous anastomoses were completed with vein couplers, joining the right gastroepiploic vein to the medial sural venae comitantes and the left gastroepiploic vein to the lesser saphenous vein. Arterial anastomoses were hand sewn, joining the right gastroepiploic artery to the proximal medial sural artery and the left gastroepiploic artery to the distal medial sural artery, to create the flowthrough configuration. A retrospective review of patients who underwent this procedure at a single institution was performed. Six patients with chronic lymphedema of the lower extremity underwent vascularized lymph node transplantation from June of 2019 to November of 2020. Five patients underwent at least 3 months of postoperative surveillance, with no postoperative complications reported. In this technique contribution, the authors describe a novel flowthrough configuration for an omental free flap to the popliteal space. The popliteal space offers an aesthetically favorable recipient location when appropriately prepared. The medial sural vessels are ideal recipient vessels for the flowthrough omental flap.

Geunwon Kim, Kevin Donohoe, Martin P. Smith, Ryoko Hamaguchi, Anna Rose Johnson, Dhruv Singhal, Leo L.Tsai.


Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine if a combination of dermal thickening and subcutaneous fluid honeycombing on non-contrast MRI, termed the dermal rim sign (DRS), can be diagnostically analogous to dermal backflow seen on lymphoscintigraphy in patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema. 

Materials and methods: Upper extremity MRI and lymphoscintigraphy were performed on patients referred to a multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic for suspicion of secondary lymphedema. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DRS on MRI in detecting dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy and the correlation between DRS, Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography, bioimpedence L-Dex® ratio and MRI Lymphedema Staging were calculated. Weighted interobserver agreements on the presence and location of DRS on MRI were calculated. 

Results: Of the 45 patients in the study, 91.1% (41/45) of patients had history of breast cancer. The average age was 58.4 ± 10.5 years, with a mean symptom duration of 4.7 ± 4.4 years. The mean BMI was 30.5 ± 7.0 kg/m2. Interobserver agreement on the presence and the extent of DRS on MRI was 0.93 [95% confidence-interval: 0.80–1]. DRS was present in 97% (32/33) of patients who demonstrated dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DRS were 96.6% [81.7%–99.9%], and 75.0% [47.6%–92.7%], 87.5% [74.9%–94.3%], and 92.3% [63.1%–98.8%]. DRS was associated with severity on ICG lymphography and bioimpedance (both p < 0.001). 

Conclusions: DRS on non-contrast MRI is highly predictive of dermal backflow and correlates with clinical measures of lymphedema severity. DRS may be used as an independent diagnostic biomarker to identify patients who would benefit from dedicated exams. 
 

 

Use of non-contrast MR in diagnosing secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities

Melisa D. Granoff, Jaime Pardo, and Dhruv Singhal.


Abstract

Background: Debulking via power-assisted liposuction has been established internationally as the gold standard for patients with chronic fat-dominant lymphedema. In this study we share our experience implementing a debulking surgery program in the United States. 

Methods and Results: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent debulking surgery using power-assisted liposuction at a single institution. Between December 2017 and January 2020, 39 patients with lymphedema underwent 41 extremity debulking procedures. In patients with lymphedema of the upper extremity, median excess volume reduction was 111% at 6 months and 116% at 12 months post-operatively. In patients with lymphedema of the lower extremity, excess volume reduction was 82% at 6 months and 115% at 12 months post-operatively. L-Dex and quality of life improved across all domains in upper and lower extremity patients as well. 

Conclusion: Debulking with power-assisted liposuction is an effective treatment for chronic lymphedema, supported by improvement in both objective and subjective metrics.
 

Power-Assisted Liposuction: An Important Tool in the Surgical Management of Lymphedema Patients 

Granoff, Melisa D. BA; Johnson, Anna Rose MD, MPH; Shillue, Kathy DPT, OCS, CLT; Fleishman, Aaron MPH; Tsai, Leo MD, PhD; Carroll, Brett MD; Donohoe, Kevin MD; Lee, Bernard T. MD, MBA, MPH; Singhal, Dhruv MD.


Abstract

Objective: To implement and evaluate outcomes from a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary debulking program in the United States. 

Summary Background Data: Interest in and access to surgical treatment for chronic lymphedema (LE) in the United States have increased in recent years, yet there remains little attention on liposuction, or debulking, as an effective treatment option. In some other countries, debulking is a common procedure for the surgical treatment of LE, is covered by insurance, and has demonstrated excellent, reproducible outcomes. In this study we describe our experience implementing a debulking technique from Sweden in the United States. 

Methods: Patients who presented with chronic lymphedema followed a systematic multi-disciplinary work-up. For debulking with power assisted liposuction, the surgical protocol was modeled after that developed by Håkan Brorson. A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent debulking at our institution was conducted. 

Results: Between December 2017 and January 2020, 39 patients underwent 41 debulking procedures with power assisted liposuction, including 23 upper and 18 lower extremities. Mean patient age was 58 years and 85% of patients had LE secondary to cancer, the majority of which (64%) was breast cancer. Patients experienced excess volume reductions of 111% and 115% in the upper and lower extremities, respectively, at one year post-operatively. Overall quality of life (LYMQOL) improved by a mean of 33%. Finally, patients reported a decreased incidence of cellulitis and decreased reliance on conservative therapy modalities post-operatively. 

Conclusions: Debulking with power assisted liposuction is an effective treatment for patients with chronic extremity lymphedema. The operation addresses patient goals and improves quality of life, and additionally reduces extremity volumes, infection rates and reliance on outpatient therapy. A comprehensive, multi-disciplinary debulking program can be successfully implemented in the United States healthcare system.

A Single Institution Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Power-Assisted Liposuction for the Management of Lymphedema. 

Kim, Geunwon; Smith, Martin P.; Donohoe, Kevin M.D.; Johnson, Anna Rose M.D. M.P.H.; Singhal, Dhruv M.D.; Tsai, Leo M.D., Ph.D.


Abstract

 

Objectives: Staging of upper extremity lymphedema is needed to guide surgical management, but is not standardized due to lack of accessible, quantitative, or precise measures. Here, we established an MRI-based staging system for lymphedema and validate it against existing clinical measures.
 

Methods: Bilateral upper extremity MRI and lymphoscintigraphy were performed on 45 patients with unilateral secondary lymphedema, due to surgical intervention, who were referred to our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic between March 2017 and October 2018. MRI short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) images were retrospectively reviewed. A grading system was established based on the cross-sectional circumferential extent of subcutaneous fluid infiltration at three locations, labeled MRI stage 0-3, and was compared to L-Dex®, ICG lymphography, volume, lymphedema quality of life (LYMQOL), International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage, and lymphoscintigraphy. Linear weighted Cohen's kappa was calculated to compare MRI staging by two readers.
 

Results: STIR images on MRI revealed a predictable pattern of fluid infiltration centered on the elbow and extending along the posterior aspect of the upper arm and the ulnar side of the forearm. Patients with higher MRI stage were more likely to be in ISL stage 2 (p = 0.002) or to demonstrate dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy (p = 0.0002). No correlation was found between MRI stages and LYMQOL. Higher MRI stage correlated with abnormal ICG lymphography pattern (rs = 0.63, p < 0.0001), larger % difference in limb volume (rs = 0.68, p < 0.0001), and higher L-Dex® ratio (rs = 0.84, p < 0.0001). Cohen's kappa was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-1.00).
 

Conclusion: An MRI staging system for upper extremity lymphedema offers an improved non-invasive precision marker for lymphedema for therapeutic planning.

MRI staging of upper extremity secondary lymphedema: correlation with clinical measurements

Johnson, Anna Rose MPH; Bravo, Miguel G. MD; Granoff, Melisa D. BA; Kang, Christine O. MD, MHS; Critchlow, Jonathan F. MD; Tsai, Leo L. MD; Lee, Bernard T. MD, MBA, MPH; Singhal, Dhruv MD


 

 

 

Abstract

​

The vascularized omental free flap has been described as a reliable option for the treatment of peripheral lymphedema. However, the flap has been associated with venous hypertension which may require venous supercharging or intra-flap arteriovenous fistula creation to offload the arterial inflow. The aim of this study is to introduce and present our experience using a flow-through omental flap as a novel approach to optimize flap hemodynamics. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality improvement database was performed. Seven consecutive patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who underwent delayed lymphatic reconstruction using a flow-through omental free flap were identified. In all patients, the right gastroepiploic artery and vein were anastomosed to the proximal end of the radial artery and to one venae comitante, respectively. An anastomosis of the distal end of the radial artery to the left gastroepiploic artery was performed. The flap was then supercharged by anastomosing the left gastroepiploic vein to the cephalic or basilic vein. There were no flap losses or other surgical complications. A distinct advantage of this inset includes the ability to moderate the arterial in-flow to the omental flap to avoid an inflow-outflow mismatch and alleviate venous hypertension. Further study is needed to validate this technique in a larger study sample with longer follow-up.

Flow-through Omental Flap for Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Novel Surgical Approach for Delayed Lymphatic Reconstruction

Tran, Bao Ngoc N. MD; Celestin, Arthur R. MD; Lee, Bernard T. MD, MBA, MPH; Critchlow, Jonathan MD; Tsai, Leo MD; Toskich, Beau MD; Singhal, Dhruv MD


Abstract

 

Quantifying lymph nodes in vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has been performed using preoperative percutaneous ultrasound. The higher resolution and accuracy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) over transcutaneous ultrasound has been demonstrated in the radiology literature for the identification and characterization of finer structures including hepatic lesions, pancreatic lesions, and biliary or pancreatic ducts. We hypothesize that IOUS during VLNT would be a superior method to quantify and map lymph nodes in our flaps. A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing VLNT over 3 years (October 2014 to October 2017) was reviewed. Patients who underwent IOUS during flap harvest, before pedicle ligation to simultaneously map and quantify the number of lymph nodes were included in the study. Twenty-one patients with an average age of 58.7 years and a mean BMI of 32.3 underwent VLNT with IOUS for chronic lymphedema during the study period. Extremity lymphedema was classified as Campisi IB (n = 7), IIA (n = 7), IIB (n = 5), and IIIA (n = 2). There were 14 superficial circumflex iliac artery flaps, including 4 performed concomitantly with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, 1 transverse cervical artery flap, and 6 omental flaps. The average number of lymph nodes transferred per IOUS was 4.3 for superficial circumflex iliac artery flaps, 4 for the transverse cervical artery flap, and 5.2 for the omental flaps. Intraoperative ultrasound allows the lymphatic surgeon to precisely map the location of lymph nodes which can guide intraoperative decision making. As there is no data correlating the number of lymph nodes transferred and outcomes after VLNT, developing a precise intraoperative quantification method is important.

Quantifying Lymph Nodes During Lymph Node Transplantation: The Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound

Stamatis Sapountzis, Pedro Ciudad, Seong Yoon Lim, Ram M Chilgar, Kidakorn Kiranantawat, Fabio Nicoli, Joannis Constantinides, Matthew Yeo Sze Wei, Tolga Taha Sönmez, Dhruv Singhal, Hung-Chi Chen

Abstract

​

Introduction: Treatment of advanced lymphedema remains a challenge in reconstructive surgery. Microsurgical techniques seem to be effective in early stage lymphedema, however in advanced stages their role is not well established. In this study, we present a novel approach for advanced lymphedema combining excisional procedure (Charles) with transferring lymph node flap.

​

Patients and method: From 2010 to 2013, 24 patients (18 women, six men, mean age 53 years old) presented with late stage of lower extremity lymphedema. The modification of Charles procedure consisted of preserving the superficial venous system of the dorsum of the foot and the lesser saphenous vein, which were used for the venous anastomosis of the transferred lymph node flap. In 11 patients we transferred the inguinal lymph node flaps from the contralateral site, meanwhile in 13 patients supraclavicular lymph node flaps were used.

​

Results: Maximum reduction of the lymphedema was achieved. No major complication was detected postoperatively. There were two patients with partial loss of the skin graft necessitated re-grafting. All the lymph node flaps survived well. The patients resumed normal daily activities within a period of 2 months. The mean follow-up was 14 months (3-26 months). During this period, no recurrence of the lymphedema was observed.

​

Conclusion: The combination of the modified Charles procedure with vascularized transferring of lymph node flap is an effective method for treatment of advanced stage lymphedema.

Modified Charles procedure and lymph node flap transfer for advanced lower extremity lymphedema

Sapountzis, Stamatis MD; Singhal, Dhruv MD; Rashid, Abid MD; Ciudad, Pedro MD; Meo, Domenico MD; Chen, Hung-Chi MD, MHA, FACS


Abstract

 

Lymph node transfer is a novel technique in lymphedema surgery. In this study, we present our experience in harvesting lymph nodes flap based on the right transverse cervical artery. In a period of 7 months, we harvested 11 cervical lymph node flaps based on the right transverse cervical artery (TCA). The reliable anatomy of the TCA and the low complication rate of the donor site make this lymph node flap ideal for transfer in the treatment of lymphedema. Knowledge of the regional anatomy and the anatomic variations of the TCA are mandatory for safe dissection of this flap. We also present the preliminary results of our first 2 cases in which we performed cervical lymph node transfer for secondary lower extremity lymphedema.

Lymph node flap based on the right transverse cervical artery as a donor site for lymph node transfer

Singhal, Dhruv M.D.; Spiguel, Lisa M.D.; Shaw, Christiana M.D.; Sapountzis, Stamatis M.D.; Mast, Bruce M.D.; Chen, Hung-Chi M.D.; Drane, Walter M.D.


Abstract

 

No abstract available. 

Lymph node transplantation and quantitative clearance lymphoscintigraphy

bottom of page